the intolerance of bores, morons, world-savers, and damn fools.”īoth Morley and Huie felt victimized by a liberal press establishment that stifled alternative voices-and, after all, liberals had the New Republic and leftists the Nation as journals of opinion-but their charge of mainstream “bias” was more complicated. “We shall cry a new crusade of intolerance. “There is now far too much ‘tolerance’ in America,” Huie declared in the first issue of the new Mercury. The same was true of the American Mercury in 1950, when under the ownership of William Bradford Huie the formerly social-democratic magazine moved to the right. The conservative magazine Human Events was launched in 1944 as an alternative to what its cofounder, Felix Morley, believed was a stifling conformity in the American press. Roosevelt and the New Deal dominated the “mainstream” press, which meant that conservative dissidents needed a home. Long before Fox News, conservatives began forming their own explicitly right-wing media landscape. Through the eyes of the right, they always have been. The American left is used to waiting for liberals to finally get ruthless. The title of that LP? Ronald Reagan Speaks Out Against Socialized Medicine. One of the binding agents holding the conservative coalition together over the course of the past half century has been an opposition to liberalism, socialism, and global communism built on the suspicion, sometimes made explicit, that there’s no real difference among them. In 1961, the American Medical Association produced an LP in which an actor opened a broadside against the proposed Medicare program by attributing to Norman Thomas, a six-time Socialist Party candidate for president, a made-up quote that “under the name of liberalism the American people will adopt every fragment of the socialist program.” Because these ideologies were so interchangeable in the imaginations of many conservatives-and were covertly collaborating to enact their nefarious agenda-this meant that it was both important and necessary to fight back through equally underhanded means. Since its very beginning, in the 1950s, members of the modern conservative movement have justified bad behavior by convincing themselves that the other side is worse. The modern Republican Party may be particularly apt to push conspiracy theories to rationalize its complicity with a staggeringly corrupt administration, but this is an extension of, not a break from, a much longer history. The liberal academic establishment prevents conservative voices from getting plum faculty jobs, so the Koch Foundation needs to give millions of dollars to universities with strings very much attached. Soros funds paid campus protestors, so Turning Point USA needs millions of dollars from Republican donors to win university elections. The Russia investigation is not just a witch hunt, it’s the product of the real scandal, which is Hillary-Russia-Obama-FBI collusion, so we must investigate that. (Disclosure: I marched that day, and I’m still awaiting my check.) What is less well appreciated by liberals is that the language of conspiracy is often used to justify similar behavior on the right. George Soros supposedly paid $300 to each participant in the “March for Our Lives” in March. The Russia investigation is dismissed, from the president on down, as a politicized witch hunt. This belief in a broad liberal conspiracy is standard in the highest echelons of the conservative establishment and right-wing media. The mainstream media and academia cannot be trusted because of the pervasive, totalitarian nature of liberal culture. They admire Mussolini and Hitler, and modern liberalism is little different from fascism or, even worse, communism. If you spend any time consuming right-wing media in America, you quickly learn the following: Liberals are responsible for racism, slavery, and the Ku Klux Klan.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |